X
More than 60,000 patients use Brite
4.6 stars
Your health finally understandable with Brite
1
Enter email and you're done. No subscription, no credit card.
2
Search, tap and you're done. Over 3,400 medicines.
3
Check, remind, get an overview.
Sarah K., 34
I finally understand my therapy. The app reminds me, answers my questions — and I don't feel alone with it anymore.
At a glance
Dose steps, intake times and blood sugar readings in one place — free in the brite app.
Sudden hearing loss is a hearing loss of the inner ear that sets in suddenly, usually affects only one ear and has no external cause that can be found. The technical term is acute idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss — “idiopathic” means without an identifiable cause. Sudden hearing loss is therefore a diagnosis of exclusion.¹
The timing is typical: the hearing loss develops within seconds to a few hours and is often noticed on waking. Many people describe it as feeling like cotton wool in the ear. There is often ringing in the ear as well.
The damage lies in the inner ear, not in the outer or middle ear. That is why the ENT practice's first task is to rule out everything that can be treated: a plug of earwax, a middle ear infection, fluid behind the eardrum or an injury to the eardrum.
This question deserves a calm answer. As a rule, sudden hearing loss is not an emergency in the sense of calling 112 (emergency number in Germany). You do not have to go to the emergency department in the middle of the night, and not every hour decides the fate of your hearing — this long-standing dramatisation can no longer be upheld today.¹,²
Even so, it is not something to sit out for days. The specialist societies recommend seeing an ENT doctor within one to three days. There are three reasons for this: it has to be clarified whether it really is sudden hearing loss. Cortisone treatment makes more sense when started in the first few days than after weeks. And the first pure-tone audiogram serves as the baseline for every follow-up check.
Isolated sudden hearing loss is urgent, but not an emergency. Sudden hearing loss with accompanying neurological signs is an emergency.
Fever, earache, discharge from the ear, and hearing loss that developed slowly or came on after a loud bang all argue against sudden hearing loss. Mild swaying dizziness can accompany sudden hearing loss — as long as you can walk safely, it is not a warning sign. Severe spinning vertigo with a tendency to fall most certainly is.
In most cases of sudden hearing loss, the cause remains unknown. Three models are discussed, none of which has been proven:¹,³
In German popular wisdom, sudden hearing loss is known as a “heart attack of the ear” — understandable, because many people affected are going through a stressful phase. However, stress has not been proven to be a cause. The only thing that has been proven is that it intensifies the perception of tinnitus. A reason to take it seriously — but not a reason to feel guilty.
Diabetes, high blood pressure and smoking are also being discussed — not an explanatory model for the individual case, but a reason to have your blood vessels checked.
The examination usually takes less than half an hour and does not hurt. It is meant to confirm that the hearing loss lies in the inner ear — and to rule out that something else is behind it.
Only when none of this reveals anything does the diagnosis of sudden hearing loss stand. For the appointment, your medication list and when the symptoms started are worth more than any amount of research — see the guide Prepare for a doctor's appointment.
Let us say it directly: the evidence for the standard treatment of sudden hearing loss is weaker than you would expect for such an established treatment. This is down to a peculiarity of the condition — in a considerable proportion of cases it heals on its own.¹,²
A relevant proportion of cases of sudden hearing loss improve without any treatment, often within the first two weeks. That is the good news — and at the same time the methodological problem of every study on sudden hearing loss: if many people recover anyway, very large, properly blinded studies are needed to make an additional benefit visible. Precisely such studies are largely lacking.
The consequence: after an improvement, it can never be said for certain whether the cortisone worked or whether the body would have sorted it out by itself.
Usually prednisolone or a comparable glucocorticoid is used. Over a few days it is generally well tolerated — but the typical pitfalls are well known.
High-dose cortisone makes blood sugar rise — in diabetes sometimes markedly and as early as the first day. Never adjust insulin or tablets on your own; clarify beforehand how often you should measure. Blood pressure can also rise; on top of that there is often fluid retention and disturbed sleep.
What glucocorticoids do in the body, and which side effects only become relevant with long-term use, is set out in the cortisone guide.
brite reminds you of every step and records what you took and when.
Around sudden hearing loss, treatments persist that used to be standard or are offered as private, self-pay services — here is a sober assessment.
| Procedure | The idea behind it | Assessment according to current knowledge |
|---|---|---|
| Infusions to improve blood flow | Better flow properties of the blood are meant to supply the inner ear | No proven benefit; HES (hydroxyethyl starch) was abandoned because of kidney risks. No longer standard treatment |
| Hyperbaric oxygen therapy | Increased oxygen pressure is meant to reach the inner ear | Mixed and methodologically weak evidence. At most an individual-case decision, usually paid for privately |
| Antiviral medicines | Suspected viral reactivation in the auditory nerve | No additional benefit in studies; not recommended |
| Ginkgo, vitamin and zinc preparations | Protecting the inner-ear cells | No robust evidence in acute sudden hearing loss |
| Strict bed rest “to take the strain off” | Reducing stress is meant to promote healing | No evidence that rest improves recovery — taking time off remains a decision, not a treatment |
The outlook is better than the first moment of shock would suggest. Mild to moderate hearing loss often recovers to a large extent; very marked hearing loss, accompanying vertigo and older age are considered less favourable signs. Plenty of exact percentages are in circulation — hardly any of them are reliable.²,⁴
For many, this is a greater burden in the long run than the hearing loss itself: tinnitus can remain even if hearing recovers. There are effective ways of dealing with it — from education through hearing therapy to psychotherapeutic methods; more in the article on tinnitus. Chronic ringing in the ear does not mean that something was missed.
Sudden hearing loss feels threatening because a sense suddenly fails. This fear is understandable, but a poor adviser when it comes to expensive additional treatments. The two most effective things are unspectacular: get examined promptly and keep your follow-up appointments.
Record your hearing, tinnitus and doses over time instead of reconstructing them.
A reminder for every dose step, a record of every check. Free.
Start now