X
More than 60,000 patients use Brite
4.6 stars
Your health finally understandable with Brite
1
Enter email and you're done. No subscription, no credit card.
2
Search, tap and you're done. Over 3,400 medicines.
3
Check, remind, get an overview.
Sarah K., 34
I finally understand my therapy. The app reminds me, answers my questions — and I don't feel alone with it anymore.
Suddenly there is a different pack waiting at the pharmacy: same active ingredient, different name, different pen. A biosimilar is not a generic but a biologically manufactured successor product that is highly similar to the original — about as similar as two production batches of the same original preparation are to one another. On current evidence, efficacy and safety are regarded as comparable. What really changes when you switch is usually something quite practical: how the pen is handled and how it is stored.
Record which preparation you have been injecting since when — including the batch number and how well you tolerate it.
Biologics — also called biopharmaceuticals — are medicines whose active ingredient is not assembled chemically but produced by living cells. They include insulins, antibodies directed against inflammatory messengers, growth factors and many modern cancer medicines. The molecules are enormous and intricately folded; their three-dimensional structure determines how they work.
Once the patent protection of such an original preparation expires, other manufacturers may develop a successor product. Because they do not know the original's production process, and because a biological molecule cannot be copied exactly, what emerges is not an identical product but a highly similar one: a biosimilar.¹
Both are successor products that appear once a patent has expired, and both are cheaper than the original — but they come about in completely different ways.
A generic contains a chemically manufactured active ingredient. Molecules of that kind are small and can be reproduced exactly: a generic is chemically identical to the original. For approval it is therefore usually enough to demonstrate bioequivalence — that the active ingredient reaches the body in a comparable amount and at a comparable speed. How that works in everyday life, and why tablets can still look different, is explained in the guide Generics vs. brand-name medicines.
A biosimilar, by contrast, is produced by living cells — usually bacterial, yeast or mammalian cell cultures. Every cell line, every culture medium, every purification step influences the end product. That is why one cannot and may not speak of "identical" here, only of "highly similar". And that is why proof of bioequivalence is not enough: a biosimilar goes through a considerably more extensive approval procedure than a generic.
| Feature | Generic | Biosimilar |
|---|---|---|
| Active ingredient | Chemically synthesised, small molecule | Produced by living cells, very large molecule |
| Relationship to the original | Chemically identical | Highly similar, not identical |
| Evidence required for approval | As a rule a bioequivalence study | Comprehensive comparability programme including clinical data |
| Typical form | Tablet, capsule | Pre-filled syringe, pen, infusion |
| Examples | Ibuprofen, metformin, ramipril | Insulins, TNF inhibitors, growth factors |
A rule of thumb for everyday life: what you swallow is usually a generic. What you inject or receive as an infusion is more likely to be a biosimilar. There are exceptions, but as a rough guide it carries you a long way.
In the European Union, biosimilars are approved centrally through the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The requirements are high — and they differ fundamentally from those for a generic.²
At the heart of the procedure is the comparability programme: a step-by-step demonstration that the biosimilar does not differ from the original in any respect relevant to efficacy and safety.
Approval follows only when all the stages together produce a coherent picture. The underlying idea: a biosimilar does not have to prove its efficacy from scratch — the original has already done that. It has to prove that it matches the original.
That is the question on everybody's mind, and the answer is pleasingly clear: on current evidence, switching between an originator biologic and its biosimilar is regarded as unproblematic. Efficacy and safety are assessed as comparable — this is the shared position of the European regulators and of independent institutions such as IQWiG, Germany's institute for quality and efficiency in health care.³
By now this has been examined extensively, among other things in switching studies in which people were moved from the original to the biosimilar and back again. No systematic loss of effect and no rise in side effects could be shown.
Even so, a switch is not a purely administrative act that you should simply let wash over you. There are good reasons to accompany it consciously:
Whether and when a switch makes sense for you is decided by the practice treating you — together with you.
There is one observation that should be named honestly, because otherwise it comes across as a reproach: people who expect to get worse after a change of preparation experience exactly that more often. Specialists call it the nocebo effect — the negative counterpart to the placebo effect.
In studies it shows up in the fact that people who know about a switch and are sceptical about it stop the new preparation more often than people who knew nothing about it — even though objective disease parameters such as inflammatory markers stay unchanged. The symptoms are not imagined: pain, tiredness and malaise really are felt. What is influenced is not the perception itself but the way it is processed.
And the other direction matters just as much: the nocebo effect is not an explanation that allows genuine symptoms to be brushed aside. If you feel worse after a switch, that belongs in front of a doctor — not talked away.
Document symptoms and values around the switch — then the comparison actually holds up.
This is where the difference that matters most in practice lies — and it has nothing to do with the active ingredient but with the device. The injection systems of different manufacturers are built differently, and anyone who has used one particular pen for years has to get used to something new.
A second, often overlooked point: carry on rotating the injection sites systematically. Hardened areas in the subcutaneous fat develop regardless of the preparation and alter absorption — they are a common but avoidable reason for an apparently fluctuating effect after a switch.
Biologics are delicate protein molecules. Heat, frost and vigorous shaking can destroy them — and you cannot always tell by looking at the solution. Most pre-filled syringes and pens are therefore kept in the fridge, usually at two to eight degrees Celsius.
All the other rules on temperature, light, humidity and shelf life are in the guide Storing medications correctly. This is exactly the point that deserves a second look when you switch: the storage requirements for a biosimilar are not automatically the same as for the preparation you are used to.
Biosimilars stopped being a niche topic long ago. They involve some of the most frequently prescribed biologics of all.
| Group of active ingredients | Typical indications | Form |
|---|---|---|
| Insulins | Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus | Pen, pre-filled syringe, pump |
| TNF inhibitors | Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis | Pre-filled syringe, pen, infusion |
| Other antibodies | Certain cancers, chronic inflammatory diseases | Usually infusion |
| Growth factors | Blood formation after chemotherapy, anaemia in kidney disease | Pre-filled syringe |
Anyone using insulin for diabetes has very probably held a biosimilar in their hand at some point. In rheumatology and gastroenterology, TNF inhibitors are the big field of application — in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. A biologic is frequently combined there with methotrexate; a switch to a biosimilar changes nothing about that underlying therapy.
Many people do not know about this point, and it is the most important organisational difference from tablets: with biologics it should always be traceable which preparation, from which batch, was given.
The reason lies in the manufacturing. Because the product comes from living cells, medicines safety has to be able to follow not just the active ingredient but the specific product and its production batch. European pharmacovigilance therefore explicitly requires that the brand name and the batch designation are documented for biologics — every single time they are used.⁴
For the same reason, with biologics: do not rely on the name of the active ingredient alone. The original and its biosimilars share the active ingredient but carry different brand names. Both should be on your list — active ingredient and product name. How to build such an overview is set out in Keeping a medication list.
Biosimilars are as a rule considerably cheaper than the original preparation. For you as someone with statutory health insurance in Germany that usually makes little difference to the co-payment — the effect is on what the health insurers spend, and the resulting price pressure often brings down the price of the original preparations as well.⁵
Two mechanisms matter in practice. First, health insurers conclude Rabattverträge (discount contracts) with individual manufacturers; the pharmacy then dispenses that manufacturer's product by preference. Second, there are German rules on substitution in the pharmacy — the aut idem provisions — which are markedly more cautious for biologics than for tablets; and the prescribing practice can rule substitution out by ticking the aut idem box on the prescription if there is a medical reason for doing so.
The result in everyday life: it can happen that a repeat prescription brings you a different pack from the one you had last time. Ask at the pharmacy when that happens, and have it confirmed that the active ingredient is the same. If the injection system changes, instruction goes with it — even when the switch happens "only" for contractual reasons.
The interaction check works on the active ingredient — even when the pack is called something else.
You have felt worse since the changeover. That may be down to the preparation, to the nocebo effect, to the injection technique — or simply to the disease being more active at the moment. The only way to tell these apart is with data and a calm head.
If careful examination reveals no other reason, switching back is possible — that is for the practice treating you to decide. It is not a failure but a normal adjustment of therapy.
Digital medication plan
Active ingredient and brand name in one place — including a notes field for the batch number, the first thing you are asked for with a biologic.
Health history
Symptoms and values before and after the changeover — so that the nocebo effect and a genuine deterioration can be told apart.
Medication reminder
With weekly or fortnightly injections, brite reminds you of the right day — and to take the pen out of the fridge in good time.
Interaction check
Checks your combination by active ingredient, not by the name on the pack — so a change of preparation changes nothing about the safety check.
Active ingredient, brand name, batch and history in one place. Free.
Start for free